 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cox v. DOI, 05-3171,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Devine v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 05-3175,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fowler v. United States Postal Serv., 05-3340,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's removal by USPS was upheld because employee did not challenge validity of agreement providing that the employee would withdraw his pending appeal to the MSPB, the employee would voluntarily resign, the USPS would cancel the removal action, and the USPS would agree to provide neutral references to private employers.
|
|||||
| Hazelquist v. Guchi Moochie Tackle Co., 05-1446,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because plaintiff was alleging patent infringing activity after the alleged infringer's bankruptcy discharge, plaintiff had a cause of action which arose after the discharge and which was not enjoined by 11 U.S.C.S. § 524. Thus, alleged infringer's discharge did not immunize him from suit for those causes of action that arose after the discharge.
|
|||||
| Hoffmann v. Dep't of the Navy, 05-3322,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hunt v. Dep't of Agric., 05-3130,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Harris, 05-1247,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Manares v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 05-3216,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mudge v. United States, 05-5055,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
