LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - Federal Circuit Court of Appeals - February 14, 2006

  
D'Avanzo v. United States, 05-5174, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 14, 2006, Decided , February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lawman Armor Corp. v. Simon, 06-1095, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 14, 2006, Decided , February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Pennekamp v. OPM, 06-3057, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 14, 2006, Decided , February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Takaki v. Dep't of the Navy, 05-3297, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 14, 2006, Decided , February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Truxes v. Dep't of the Air Force, 05-3386, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence, as required by 5 U.S.C.S. § 7703(c) for affirmance, supported the MSPB's conclusion on charges the employee (1) misrepresented hours spent on assigned work, i.e., ensuring that certain software programs could be tested on an automated testing system the agency had adopted, and (2) failed to carry out assigned work.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Zhejiang Native Produce & Animal By-Products Imp. & Exp. Corp. v. United States, 05-1058, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 14, 2006, Decided , February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.