 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Benjamin v. OPM, 06-3044,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided , February 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Brenneman v. OPM Mgmt., 05-3286,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: MSPB did not err in affirming decision to deny employee's application for disability retirement under Civil Service Retirement System because the record indicated that MSPB considered the testimony of the employee and her psychiatrist and found it insufficient, and court had no authority, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.S. § 8347(c), to disturb that finding.
|
|||||
| Coradeschi v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 05-3075,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A former employee made sufficient nonfrivolous allegations that he was an employee for purposes of 5 U.S.C.S. § 7511 and MSPB jurisdiction where his prior position as an INS agent and his subsequent federal air marshal position required him to apprehend and subdue criminals, carry and be proficient with a firearm, and investigate criminal activity.
|
|||||
| King v. Nicholson, 05-7106,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lower court properly held that a veteran had abandoned his appeal of an earlier effective for an increased disability rating as he did not show that the BVA failed to apply an exception to 38 U.S.C.S. § 5110(a) and did not argue that he filed his claim for an increased rating earlier than the year the BVA finally decided his 50 percent rating.
|
|||||
| Lamb v. Nicholson, 2006-7056,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided , February 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| M. Eagles Tool Warehouse, Inc. v. Fisher Tooling Co., 05-1224, -1228,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lack of good faith explanation for failing to disclose prior art in patent application did not by itself establish intent to deceive patent examiner to support finding of patent invalidity based on inequitable conduct, and differences between prior device and patented device precluded finding that inventor must have known prior device was relevant.
|
|||||
| McPhail v. Nicholson, 05-7118,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The lower court properly held that a veteran had abandoned his allegations of clear and unmistakable error where he failed to assert that two disability rating decisions were not final or that certain statements constituted a notice of disagreement (NOD) and he had not sought an extension of time to file an NOD.
|
|||||
| Pac. Aero. & Elecs., Inc. v. Sri Hermetics, Inc., 2006-1123,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided , February 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Tully v. MSPB, 05-3309,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided , February 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
