 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bonner v. VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Sys., 05-3349,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court lacked jurisdiction under 5 U.S.C.S. § 7121(f) to review a federal employee's suspension since the employee was appointed by VA as a health-care professional outside of civil service under 38 U.S.C.S. § 7401(1), and thus the employee was not within the coverage of statutory adverse actions reviewable under 5 U.S.C.S. § 7121(f).
|
|||||
| Imagination & Info., Inc. v. Gates, 2006-1577,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Decided , February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Hays, 2006-1311,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Decided , February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Schachar, 2006-1373,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Decided , February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kalil v. Dep't of Agric., 06-3098,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported MSPB's decision to affirm employee's suspension because the outrageous character of the ex parte contact by the employee, an attorney, with a court regarding ongoing litigation supplied clear and convincing evidence that agency would suspended him absent any whistle-blowing activities under 5 U.S.C.S. § 2302(b)(8)(A).
|
|||||
| Manning v. United States, 2006-1553,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Decided , February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| RFR Indus. v. Century Steps, Inc., 2005-1610, 2006-1285,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in granting alleged patent infringer's motion for judgment on pleadings because patent assignee voluntarily dismissed action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(i) before alleged infringer served its answer on assignee. Because alleged infringer was not prevailing party, it was not entitled to attorney fees under 35 U.S.C.S. § 285.
|
|||||
| Ryste & Ricas, Inc. v. Harvey, 06-1196,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In view of the plain language of the applicable regulations, 48 C.F.R. §§ 52.249-2(e), 2.101, and the court's decision in Swanson Group, the contractor was required to submit its termination settlement proposal within one year of the effective date of termination. It failed to do so. Summary judgment in favor of Department of the Army was affirmed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
