 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Flores v. Nicholson, 2006-7198,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Veterans claims appeals court ruling approving termination of VA survivor benefit to veteran's widow upon disclosure of her secret remarriage was upheld despite claim that 38 U.S.C.S. § 103(d)(3) had been misinterpreted because § 103(d)(3) only restored benefits lost due to remarriage, not benefits lost per 38 U.S.C.S. § 6103(a) by reason of fraud.
|
|||||
| Markovich v. Sec'y of HHS, 06-5039,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of a parents' petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was affirmed; because the parents filed their petition more than 36 months after the initial symptoms (the child's eye blinking episode), the petition was time-barred under 42 U.S.C.S. § 300aa-16(a)(2).
|
|||||
| MyMail, Ltd. v. Am. Online, Inc., 06-1147, 06-1172,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's summary judgment of non-infringement of patent describing method by which network customers gained remote access to network using ISPs and access providers was affirmed because authentication was required function and because plaintiff, having agreed to district court's claim construction, could not reject construction on appeal.
|
|||||
| E-Pass Techs., Inc. v. 3COM Corp., 2006-1356, 2006-1357, 2006-1358,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sevenson Envtl. Servs. v. Shaw Envtl., Inc., 2006-1391, 2006-1408,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment that government contractor who used patented method in performing environmental remediation for federal government was immune from patent infringement due to government contractor immunity in 28 U.S.C.S. § 1498(a) was upheld because contractor established that use was for government and occurred with its authorization and consent.
|
|||||
| Adrain v. Superchips, Inc., 2006-1376,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Decided , February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Logan v. Hormel Foods, Inc., 2006-1114,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Decided , February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
