 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kalin v. Nicholson, 05-7136,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court declined to decide whether the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims misinterpreted 38 C.F.R. § 3.105(a) where the lower court had not required the veteran to prove that the errors would have been outcome determinative with respect to the merits of his claim.
|
|||||
| Lowgren v. Nicholson, 05-7169,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 6, 2006, Decided , March 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ragard v. United States, 05-5127,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a lower court incorrectly determined that the interpretation of a diversion agreement was a question of fact, its dismissal of a service member's claims was nonetheless affirmed as the agreement clearly did not bar the service member's court martial; rather, it required the District of Columbia to dismiss pending criminal charges.
|
|||||
| Retamal v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 05-1332,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court lacked jurisdiction to consider an individual's appeal of the United States Court of International Trade's decision challenging the revocation of his customhouse broker license as the claims did not relate to the administration and enforcement of a matter referred to in 28 U.S.C.S. § 1581(a)-(h) or in 28 U.S.C.S. § 1581(i)(1)-(3).
|
|||||
| De Maio v. Dep't of the Treasury, 06-3137,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided , March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dominguez v. United States Postal Serv., 05-3132,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided , March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hunt v. Dep't of Agric., 05-3130,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided , March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Koito Mfg. Co. v. Turn-Key-Tech, LLC, 05-1475,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided , March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Miller v. Dep't of the Army, 2006-3169,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided , March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
