 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ahrens v. United States, 06-5020,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC) ruling that the federal civilian employees' backpay claims were barred by accord and satisfaction was affirmed because the COFC correctly ruled that the government established the disputed consideration element and the disputed meeting of the minds element of the accord and satisfaction defense.
|
|||||
| Baguioen v. Nicholson, 2006-7360,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appeal of a veteran's widow from a veterans court's decision, which dismissed her untimely appeal of BVA's denial of dependency and indemnity compensation, was dismissed because she filed her notice of appeal to the veterans court more than 120 days after the date of BVA's final decision, pursuant to 38 U.S.C.S. § 7266(a).
|
|||||
| Designing Health, Inc. v. Erasmus, 2006-1244,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an appellate court reversed a jury verdict as to damages, and ordered the district court to grant judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 on remand, no issue was remanded for further proceedings, and the district court had no discretion to grant a new trial on the issue of damages.
|
|||||
| Time 'n Temperature Co. v. Sensitech, Inc., 2006-1404,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Decided , February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
