Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	Federal Courts - Federal Circuit Court of Appeals - March 1, 2007
	Transonic Sys. v. Fresenius USA, Inc., 2006-1422, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 1, 2007, Decided , March 1, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Jackman, 2007-1140, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 1, 2007, Decided , March 1, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Whirlpool Corp. v. LG Elecs., Inc., 2007-1088, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 1, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Plaintiff's appeal of an order granting defendants summary judgment of noninfringement and invalidity of patents was dismissed as premature because not all of the claims for relief in defendants' counterclaims were disposed of, including the issue of unenforceability, and no judgment was entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Whirlpool Corp. v. LG Elecs., Inc., 2007-1088, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 1, 2007, Decided , March 1, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: By denying summary judgment only on issues raised by motions for summary judgment, district court did not clearly decide all of the relief sought by the counterclaimants. Since not all claims for relief were disposed of, and no judgment was entered per Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), there was no final judgment and appeal had to be dismissed as premature. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.