 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ad Global Fund, LLC v. United States, 06-5046,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly entered against company, which filed suit under 26 U.S.C.S. § 6226 challenging timeliness of final partnership administrative adjustment notice issued by IRS. 26 U.S.C.S. § 6229(a) did not provide separate limitations period for tax assessments on partnership items. Notice was timely issued under 26 U.S.C.S. § 6501(a).
|
|||||
| Cheney v. DOJ, 06-3124,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board that sustained the action of the DEA indefinitely suspending the employee from employment was reversed; the procedural requirements of 5 U.S.C.S. § 7513 were not met as the DEA failed to provide the employee with the information he needed to make "a meaningful response" to the charges against him.
|
|||||
| Int'l Data Prods. Corp. v. United States, 2006-5083, 2006-5094,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Decided , March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lambert v. Nicholson, 2007-7063,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Decided , March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Louis B. Fine Family, LLC v. Potter, 2006-1529,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Decided , March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Meritage Real Estate Dev. Group, Inc. v. Grimaud, 2007-1090,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Decided , March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sawgrass Techs., Inc. v. Tex. Original Graphics, Inc., 06-1190,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the district court's order simply transferred venue without any need or action to cure jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C.S. § 1292(a)(4)(A) did not apply. Without any basis for invoking the exceptions to the finality rule under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1291, the district court's order was interlocutory and lacked any jurisdictional basis for an immediate appeal.
|
|||||
| Simmons v. SBA, 2006-3415,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Decided , March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Walter Kidde Portable Equip., Inc. v. Universal Sec. Instruments, Inc., 06-1420,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a district court committed error when it dismissed an alleged infringer's counterclaims over objection when the court granted plaintiff patentee's voluntary motion to dismiss without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), the error was harmless; the alleged infringer could reassert all its counterclaims, and was not prejudiced.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
