 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Roberts v. DOC, 2006-3356,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: MSPB did not err in analyzing facts under 5 U.S.C.S. § 7501 et seq., and substantial evidence supported its finding that employee's "ranting and raving" in refusing surrender her government identification showed that she could not be relied on to act professionally and, thus, that agency properly removed her for conduct unbecoming federal employee.
|
|||||
| Waiters v. Nicholson, 2007-7124,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Decided , March 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ian-Benet v. DOD, 2006-3416,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reviewing the MSPB decision under the 5 U.S.C.S. § 7703(a) standard, the court found that the former agency employee did not provide evidence that the agency failed to meet the terms of a settlement agreement with respect to inquiries from prospective employers and did not prove that it failed to meet the terms and conditions of the agreement.
|
|||||
| In re Serenkin, 06-1242,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision of the PTO Board rejecting the applicant's request for a reissue of a patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C.S. § 251 was affirmed because the reissue provisions of § 251 were not intended to correct an earlier deliberate decision made in the patent application process to accept a later filing date at the request of the PTO.
|
|||||
| Int'l Data Prods. Corp. v. United States, 2006-5083, -5094,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| SanDisk Corp. v. ITC, 06-1187,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
