 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Slokevage, 05-1389 (Serial No. 75/602,873),
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An applicant's appeal from refusal to register a trade dress mark for clothing was unsuccessful because substantial evidence supported the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's determinations that the applicant's trade dress was product design and was not unitary.
|
|||||
| Infiltrator Sys. v. Cultec, Inc., 05-1375,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the only allegedly infringing product at issue in the patent infringement aspect of a case was no longer being manufactured, sold, or offered for sale, and would not have been in the future, the appeal of the denial of defendants' motion for a preliminary injunction was dismissed because there was no live case or controversy.
|
|||||
| Kao Corp. v. Unilever United States, Inc., 05-1038, 05-1049,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's holding that a cosmetic product patent was valid was affirmed as the patent holders had complied with the written description requirement and had not committed inequitable conduct during the patent's prosecution. The noninfringement conclusion was affirmed as no part of the accused product met all the claim limitations.
|
|||||
| King v. United States Postal Serv., 05-3161,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 21, 2006, Decided , March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Nika v. MSPB, 06-3072,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 21, 2006, Decided , March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
