 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barbacid v. Brown, 2007-1121 (Interference No. 103,586),
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ruling was dismissed as untimely over appellants' claim that ruling was never received and despite ALJ's later, sua sponte ruling purporting to change date thereof because appellants had independent duty to monitor proceedings and failed to seek extension of time per 37 C.F.R. § 1.304(a)(3)(ii).
|
|||||
| Boechler v. DOI, 05-3252,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Cellco P'ship v. Broadcom Corp., 20 06-1514,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Chavez v. Nicholson, 2007-7062,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided , March 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit lacked jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C.S. § 7292 to review appellant veteran's claims that the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) should have applied certain regulations to his request to reopen based on new and material evidence and that the Court did not fairly evaluate his new evidence.
|
|||||
| Eon-Net, L.P. v. Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., 2007-1132,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion for a stay pending appeal of the execution of sanctions judgment in favor of defendant was denied because plaintiff, who was sanctioned for failing to identify a product infringing its patent, support an infringement claim, or conduct adequate prefiling investigation, did not establish strong likelihood of success on the merits.
|
|||||
| Gaddy v. Dep't of the Navy, 2007-3001,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: MSPB's affirmance of removal of an employee from a civilian police officer position was supported by substantial evidence, including Navy witness testimony that he knew of the policies he failed to following regarding access to a military base and the pursuit of vehicles when he refused access to a guest and performed a dangerous vehicle maneuver.
|
|||||
| Hunt v. United States, 05-5141, 05-5179,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided , March 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hunter v. VA, 2006-3338,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided , March 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Nike, Inc. v. Meitac Int'l Enter. Co., Ltd., 2007-1070,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
