 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Catolico v. Nicholson, 06-7028,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 27, 2006, Decided , March 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Garcia v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, 05-3373,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: MSPB decision dismissing an employee's appeal of termination during the probationary period because she had failed to establish jurisdiction based on marital status discrimination was upheld under 5 U.S.C.S. § 7703(c). Substantial evidence supported the AJ's conclusion that discrimination based on marital status had not been established.
|
|||||
| Hilts v. OPM, 2006-3019,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 27, 2006, Decided , March 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mogyorossy v. Dep't of the Air Force, 2006-3095,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 27, 2006, Decided , March 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Seldovia Vill. Tribe v. Leavitt, 05-1536,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 27, 2006, Decided , March 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States Philips Corp. v. Princo Corp., 05-1388,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: 35 U.S.C.S. § 271(d)(5) provided a safe harbor for certain conduct, not a comprehensive definition of patent misuse. Also, the district court erred in reading the statute to preclude a finding of patent misuse unless the tied patents involved multiple products. Therefore, the district court's dismissal of a patent misuse claim was vacated.
|
|||||
| Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Miracle Optics, Inc., 04-1138,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided , March 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fiber Optic Designs, Inc. v. Seasonal Specialties, L.L.C., 05-1488,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 28, 2006, Decided , March 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
