 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Envtl. Safety Consultants, Inc. v. Winter, 2006-1292,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided , March 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Winter v. Envtl. Safety Consultants, Inc., 2006-1180,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 29, 2006, Decided , March 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Adamo v. DOD, 2006-3184,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided , March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bourdeau Bros. v. ITC, 04-1588,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Importation and sale of a trademarked good of domestic manufacture, produced solely for sale abroad and not authorized by the trademark owner for sale in the U.S., may violate 19 U.S.C.S. § 1337 if the imported good was materially different from substantially all of those goods bearing the same trademark that were authorized for sale in the U.S.
|
|||||
| Gay v. DOJ, 06-3055,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided , March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Joyce v. Nicholson, 05-7152,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims was dismissed because that court's decision was not final and thus was not reviewable. If the case involved only a single claim, review was unavailable under Williams. If the case involved separate claims for service connection and aggravation, review was unavailable under Elkins.
|
|||||
| McCall-Scovens v. MSPB, 05-3238,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: MSPB properly dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, a federal probationary employee's appeal of her discharge because the partisan political reprisals the employee alleged were actions of co-workers and superiors that were unrelated to her political affiliations with a political party or candidate, as required by 5 U.S.C.S. § 315.806(b).
|
|||||
| Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc., 05-1329,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In granting partial summary judgment to defendant in patent infringement action, district court erred in construing the patent claims to cover additional support for auxiliary glasses. The prosecution history distinguished the prior art because plaintiff's statements clearly and unmistakably disclaimed coverage of a device with additional support.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
