 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. Medrad, Inc., 06-1156, 06-1157,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding that the first two patents were invalid under 35 U.S.C.S. § 112, and 35 U.S.C.S. § 102 was affirmed because there was evidence that there was not compliance with the written description and enablement requirements. The other two patents were barred by defendant's prior art patent that sufficiently disclosed physical indicia parameters.
|
|||||
| Overton v. Nicholson, 2007-7090,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 22, 2007, Decided , March 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., 2006-1261,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A patented drug using amlodipine salt compounds was ruled invalid for obviousness, where the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art, under 35 U.S.C.S. § 103(a); a skilled artisan would have used a besylate salt.
|
|||||
| Abadia v. OPM, 2006-3297,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 23, 2007, Decided , March 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Colassi v. Cybex Int'l, Inc., 2006-1231,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 23, 2007, Decided , March 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Groves v. Nicholson, 2007-7044,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 23, 2007, Decided , March 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| RFR Indus. v. Rex-Hide Indus., 20 05-1587,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's actions did not constitute a waiver of arbitration as to its two claims arising under a settlement agreement. Plaintiff had not attempted to litigate claims it sought to arbitrate. Because plaintiff could seek arbitration on the claims, portion of injunction directing it to file all future related actions with the court was reversed.
|
|||||
| Siwa v. OPM, 2006-3174,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 23, 2007, Decided , March 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Transclean Corp. v. Jiffy Lube Int'l, Inc., 06-1077,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 23, 2007, Decided , March 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
