 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fortinet, Inc. v. ITC, 06-1014,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Sud-Chemie Inc., MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 817,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner was denied a writ of mandamus directing vacatur of an order compelling the production of documents in a declaratory judgment action against respondent because petitioner's right to relief was not clear when the district court conducted a thorough document-by-document review and there was no clear appellate authority on the precise issue.
|
|||||
| Jack v. DOC, 2006-3186,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jibilian v. United States, 05-5157,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a taxpayer did not dispute that he earned substantial income during the period in question, the taxpayer was liable for tax on that income, under 26 U.S.C.S. §§ 1(a), 61, and his arguments to the contrary were without merit. Certificates of assessments and payments created a presumption that the IRS complied with 26 U.S.C.S. § 6203.
|
|||||
| Poole v. United States, 2006-5028,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A servicemember's appeal from claims court's non-final orders remanding his challenge of a disability rating to the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records and directing the U.S. to respond to his brief was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1295(a)(3) because the claims court had not concluded its proceedings.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. Virginia, 2006-1210,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Side v. United States Postal Serv., 2006-3188,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wadlington v. United States, 06-5015,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wiens v. Dep't of the Treasury, 05-3381,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed a decision by MSPB upholding IRS's dismissal of an employee for being AWOL for 111 hours over a prior 6-week period because the employee, who had failed to obtain medical recertification supporting further leave after FMLA leave granted under 5 U.S.C.S. §§ 6381-87 expired, was not entitled to further FMLA leave simply for the asking.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
