 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cent. Admixture Pharm. Servs. v. Advanced Cardiac Solutions, P.C., 2006-1307,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where patentees obtained a certificate of correction for an error that was not clearly evident to one of skill in the art, and the result of the correction was to broaden the scope of the claims, the certificate, in the 35 U.S.C.S. § 255 context, was invalid, and the district court was required to consider infringement as to the original patent.
|
|||||
| Immersion Corp. v. Sony Computer Entm't Am. Inc., 2005-1358,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 3, 2007, Decided , April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Richlin Sec. Serv. Co. v. Chertoff, 06-1055,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Richlin Sec. Serv. Co. v. Chertoff, 06-1055,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 3, 2007, Decided , April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Springer v. Adkins, MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 845,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 3, 2007, Decided , April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Office of Personnel Management demonstrated requisite substantial impact under 5 U.S.C.S. § 7703(d) for judicial review of the MSPB's decision that a retiree was entitled to an enhanced retirement annuity under 5 U.S.C.S. § 8412(d) because it alleged that the decision would alter the method of computation of annuities for new and current employees.
|
|||||
| Sweeney v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 2007-3091,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 3, 2007, Decided , April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wilkes v. Dep't of the Treasury, 2006-3294,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wilkes v. Dep't of the Treasury, 2006-3294,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 3, 2007, Decided , April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Windy City Innovations, LLC v. Am. Online, Inc., 2006-1454, 2006-1475,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 3, 2007, Decided , April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
