LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - Federal Circuit Court of Appeals - April 11, 2006

  
Ahearn v. United States Postal Serv., 05-3377, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided , April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Arlaine & Gina Rockey, Inc. v. Cordis Corp., 05-1236, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided , April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Barclay v. United States, 05-1255, 05-5109, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court adhered to its holding in Caldwell that the issuance of the original Notices of Interim Trail Use or Abandonment (NITUs) triggered the accrual of the cause of action. Therefore, the landowners' Fifth Amendment takings claims, which were filed more than six years after the original NITUs were issued, were time-barred.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Baro v. Nicholson, 2006-7064, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided , April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cantu v. Nicholson, 06-7034, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided , April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Coca-Cola Co. v. Tarabula, 05-1516, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided , April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cruise v. DOC, 05-3230, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided , April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ebert v. Nicholson, 05-7094, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Court upheld decision affirming denial of veteran's application for benefits under 38 U.S.C.S. ch. 3. All but one of veteran's arguments raised factual, not legal, issues and were not subject to review. Veteran's due process claim failed on merits-- "secret evidence" did not influence decision of United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Fleming v. United States Postal Serv., 06-3048, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: MSPB's removal of an employee from his job for alleged improper conduct, consisting of refusal to follow a supervisor's order and physically attacking the supervisor was affirmed because substantial evidence supported the final decision of the Board sustaining the penalty of removal. The employee struck first in a pushing match with his supervisor.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Frazer v. Schlegel, 06-1155 (Interference No. 104, 776), UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided , April 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.