 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Canady v. Nicholson, 2007-7021,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Canady v. Nicholson, 2007-7021,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Decided , April 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Carabetta Enters. v. United States, 06-5037, 06-5043,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In breach of contract action brought by low-income rental property owners sponsored by HUD, court affirmed liability of U.S. pursuant to Appropriations Act (Act). Even if Act was sovereign act, HUD was still obligated to fulfill obligations under repayment agreement through substitute performance of providing substitute loans to owners' properties.
|
|||||
| Compliant Corp. v. Hutchins, 2007-1181,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Decided , April 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dudley v. United States, 2007-5043,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Decided , April 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A prisoner's motion for reconsideration of an order, which directed him to pay a filing fee in his action against the U.S., was denied and his appeal was dismissed because he did not pay the fee or show that the provisions of 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(g) were not applicable to his case.
|
|||||
| F & G Research, Inc. v. Paten Wireless Tech., Inc., 2007-1095, -1166, 2007-1206,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| F & G Research, Inc. v. Paten Wireless Tech., Inc., 2007-1095, 2007-1166, 2007-1206,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Decided , April 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Green v. Nicholson, 2007-7134,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Decided , April 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Harris-Coleman v. OPM, 2007-3047,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Decided , April 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
