LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - Federal Circuit Court of Appeals - April 5, 2007

  
Baychar, Inc. v. Burton Corp., 2007-1106, 2007-1113, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 5, 2007, Decided , April 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Doe v. United States, 2006-5119, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dyer v. Nicholson, 2007-7017, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 5, 2007, Decided , April 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Flores v. Nicholson, 2006-7198, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 5, 2007, Decided , April 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hartman v. Nicholson, 2006-7303, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Court affirmed a ruling that the 38 U.S.C.S. § 5103(a) notice requirement did not apply when a veteran filed an appeal to the BVA from an initial decision of the VA Regional Office denying a veteran an earlier date for the commencement of disability benefits. Judgment affirming denial of request for an earlier effective date for PTSD was affirmed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Howard v. United States, 2007-5035, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Infineon Techs. N. Am. Corp. v. Mosaid Techs., Inc., 2007-1085, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 5, 2007, Decided , April 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kan Plasai v. DOT, 2007-3043, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: MSPB properly approved a settlement agreement and dismissed an employee's appeal of her removal by agency because conclusory allegation that a mental condition impaired her judgment and that AJ coerced her into signing did not show that agreement was involuntary when she was represented by counsel and acknowledged that it was freely made.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Korsinsky v. Dudas, 2007-1029, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Director of PTO was properly granted summary judgment on APA claims because denial of untimely petition to reinstate patent and motion for reconsideration was not arbitrary or capricious when owner failed to prove that he had agreement with his wife that prevented payment of maintenance fees under 35 U.S.C.S. § 41(b) and that delay was unavoidable.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Polk v. United States, 07-5030, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A court of federal claims properly dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, a service member's wrongful termination claim for damages against the U.S. as barred by the statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2501 because it was filed more than six years after his discharge.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.