 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bruckelmyer v. Ground Heaters, Inc., 05-1412,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly granted defendants summary judgment of invalidity in a patent infringement action where two figures contained in a Canadian patent application were publicly accessible and as a result, the Canadian patent application was a printed publication for purposes of 35 U.S.C.S. § 102(b).
|
|||||
| Computervision Corp. v. United States, 05-5014,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where taxpayer filed timely refund claim with the IRS on one issue but filed a claim for non-related interest 10 years later, its interest suspension claim was barred by 26 U.S.C.S. § 6511(a) because the informal claim, waiver, general claim, and germaneness doctrines were inapplicable to the claim for non-related interest under 26 U.S.C.S. § 7422.
|
|||||
| Washburn v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 2006-3147,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 20, 2006, Decided , April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Parental Guide of Tex., Inc. v. Thomson, Inc., 05-1493,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Interpreting a settlement agreement under Texas law, the court found there was no "Litigation Royalty" expressly determined in the prior lawsuit in accordance with law applicable to 35 U.S.C.S. § 284, such that the alleged infringer was not obligated to pay a contingent payment under the Agreement. Summary judgment for alleged infringer was upheld.
|
|||||
| Richlin Sec. Serv. Co. v. Chertoff, 05-1085,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 21, 2006, Decided , April 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sun Coast Merch. Corp. v. CCL Prods. Enters., 05-1173, 05-1216,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Infringement, 35 U.S.C.S. § 271, was a fact question. Because the court clarified the construction of "trunnions" and "damping means," and several issues remained to be addressed, the case was remanded to determine whether certain designs literally infringed asserted claims of a patent disclosing a calculator containing a certain lid mechanism.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
