LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - Federal Circuit Court of Appeals - May 2, 2006

  
Blue Dot Energy Co. v. United States, 05-5058, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: USAF was within its discretion under Competition in Contracting Act to issue a sole-source solicitation and award a solid waste disposal contract to a holder of a Washington State Utilities and Transportation Commission certificate, rather than to a competitor who had no certificate, after finding that the holder was the only responsible source.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Browder v. Nicholson, 05-7182, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Court upheld order of veterans' appeals court dismissing veteran's petition challenging Secretary of Veterans Affairs' appointment of fiduciary per 38 U.S.C.S. § 5502(a)(1); as veterans' appeals court would not have had jurisdiction over order of board of veterans' appeals, it rightly ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to review issue as presented.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Flexible Innovations, Ltd.. v. Am. Covers, Inc., 06-1028, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 2, 2006, Decided , May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Fritsch v. Nicholson, 05-7196, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 2, 2006, Decided , May 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Global Maintech Corp. v. I/O Concepts, Inc., 05-1340, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defense summary judgment of non-infringement was affirmed over patentee's claim that district court construed relevant claim limitation too narrowly as district court was right to consider context of intrinsic evidence and to rely on extrinsic evidence merely to support claim construction from claims, written description, and prosecution history.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kyocera Wireless Co. v. President Elecs., Ltd., 06-1131, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A wireless company was properly granted summary judgment on its claim for a judgment declaring that it did not infringe on a patentee's design patent because the district court carefully compared the accused cellular telephone with the patented design and expert testimony was not necessary when the case did not involve complex technology.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Northwest La. Fish & Game Pres. Comm'n v. United States, 05-5031, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because the growth of vegetation in a lake was a slow natural process that had not stabilized to cause a taking claim to accrue until well after a particular pool constructed by the United States Corps of Engineers had reached its capacity, a decision holding that the takings claim was time barred by 28 U.S.C.S. § 2501 was reversed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Nowak v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 06-3063, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The MSPB properly dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, an employee's appeal from her separation from a federal agency because she was covered by a CBA that did not specifically exclude RIF actions from its alternative dispute resolution process, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.S. § 7121(a).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.