 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| P.N.A. Constr. Techs., Inc. v. McTech Group, LLC, 2006-1287,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided , May 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rex Serv. Corp. v. United States, 05-5142,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A federal claims court properly dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, a bid protest challenging a contract award by the U.S. Department of Defense to a successful bidder because the former named source could have bid, but chose not to, and, thus, was not an actual or potential bidder and an interested party with standing.
|
|||||
| Sissay G. Habtemariam v. OPM, 06-3076,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: MSPB abused its discretion in denying a 5 U.S.C.S. § 7701(a)(1) hearing on an employee's appeal from a denial of a deferred annuity because its AJ allowed a delay in filing the appeal based on a likely delay in mail service to a foreign country but incongruously denied his hearing right when he was unable to take part in a pre-hearing conference.
|
|||||
| Thomas Indus. v. Gast Mfg., 05-1472,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided , May 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
