 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gershfeld v. MSPB, 2006-3347,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: MSPB properly dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction under 5 U.S.C.S. § 7701(a), an employee's appeal, which requested corrections to his pay history, because his reassignment involved a promotion at a higher salary and not a reduction in either grade or pay and he did not show that the agency improperly followed its rules in delaying his promotion.
|
|||||
| In re Princo Corp., MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 841,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent was denied rehearing of decision, which granted petitioners writ of mandamus directing a stay until related proceedings, including appeals, became final because 19 U.S.C.S. § 1337 did not define finality for purposes of 28 U.S.C.S. § 1659, which meant that a Commission proceeding did not "become final" until all appeals were exhausted.
|
|||||
| In re Princo Corp., Miscellaneous No. 841,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided , May 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mullins v. DOC, 06-3284,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.S. § 7703(c)(1)-(3), MSPB's affirmance of agency's removal of an employee was supported by substantial evidence, including his testimony that he submitted fabricated hotel receipts, and the deciding official's knowledge of the employee's prior job losses was not an ex parte communication and did not violate due process.
|
|||||
| Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bag Comm. v. United States, 2006-1601,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Exporters of polyethylene retail carrier bags were properly excluded from antidumping order, since electricity costs were properly calculated based on total usage, raw materials costs were market-determined, and generalized methodologies for reporting factors of production and allocating ink consumption were proper absent product-specific data.
|
|||||
| Trobovic v. MSPB, 2006-3341,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Johnson & Johnston Assocs. v. R.E. Serv. Co., 2006-1252, 2006-1253, 2006-1545, 2006-1546,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 8, 2007, Decided , May 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State Contr. & Eng'g Corp. v. Condotte Am., Inc. , 2007-1275,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 8, 2007, Decided , May 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
