 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hardy v. United States Postal Serv., 2007-3112,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided , May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Leapfrog Enters. v. Fisher-Price, Inc., 06-1402,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A patent for a device which taught reading to children by associating letters with their phonemic sounds was not infringed since a competing device only allowed selection of a word rather than a depicted letter, and the patent was invalid as obvious since it merely updated a prior mechanical device with electrical components.
|
|||||
| Meritage Real Estate Dev. Group, Inc. v. Grimaud, 2007-1090,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided , May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Michael v. Nicholson, 2007-7070,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A veteran was not entitled to extraordinary relief in the nature of mandamus requiring an award of retroactive disability benefits for an anxiety disorder, since the veteran's case was still being adjudicated and the inevitable delay associated with developing the veteran's claims did not necessarily amount to unreasonable delay.
|
|||||
| Tennyson v. OPM, 2007-3156,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided , May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Loving v. Dep't of the Treasury, 2007-3187,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 10, 2007, Decided , May 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Maibie v. MSPB, 2006-3275,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 10, 2007, Decided , May 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PHG Techs., LLC v. Timemed Labeling Sys., 2007-1042, 2007-1043,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 10, 2007, Decided , May 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
