 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Former Emples. of Quality Fabricating, Inc. v. United States Secy. of Labor, 05-1486,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While U.S. Court of International Trade had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1581(d) over trade adjustment assistance certifications under Trade Act of 1974 for primarily-affected workers, Court lacked jurisdiction over determinations concerning secondarily-affected workers since secondarily-affected worker benefits did not fall under Trade Act.
|
|||||
| Mobley v. United States Postal Serv., 2006-3218,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 24, 2006, Decided , May 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Touchcom, Inc. v. Dresser, Inc., 2006-1280,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 24, 2006, Decided , May 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| MStar Semiconductor, Inc. v. ITC, 05-1129,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: International Trade Commission's finding that the importation of certain semiconductor devices infringed a patent for a method and device to increase the resolution of a video image displayed on a computer monitor was affirmed because, inter alia, the importer failed to explain how its claim construction differed from the Commission's construction.
|
|||||
| Old Stone Corp. v. United States, 05-5059,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a bank holding company was entitled to recover mitigation payments that it had made to replace the regulatory capital eliminated by FIRREA, the lower court erred in concluding that it was entitled to restitution damages given its election to continue performance under the assistance agreements.
|
|||||
| Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp. v. Contec Corp., 05-1351, 05-1352,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 25, 2006, Decided , May 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vaughns v. OPM, 05-3253,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 25, 2006, Decided , May 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Williams v. MSPB, 05-3361,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: MSPB's dismissal of a former employee's appeal of his removal as untimely was reversed where the absence of an adequate statement of the time limits measuring the appeal from the date of receipt of a facsimile copy of the 2001 agency removal decision letter established good reason for the filing delay.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
