 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. Nicholson, 2006-7084,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 31, 2006, Decided , May 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Cruz v. OPM, 2006-3193,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 31, 2006, Decided , May 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gooden v. OPM, 05-3254,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 31, 2006, Decided , May 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| KAO Corp. v. Unilever United States, Inc., 05-1038, 05-1049,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 31, 2006, Decided , May 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lava Trading, Inc. v. Sonic Trading Mgmt., LLC, 05-1177, 05-1192,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 31, 2006, Decided , May 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lawman Armor Corp. v. Winner Int'l, LLC, 20, 05-1253,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lawman Armor Corp. v. Winner Int'l, LLC, 20, 05-1253,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied patentee's motion for rehearing in patent infringement case in which it held that overall appearance of design could not itself be point of novelty but clarified that combination of design elements might constitute a "point of novelty" and that such a combination was different concept than overall appearance of design.
|
|||||
| Layao v. OPM, 2005-3105,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 31, 2006, Decided , May 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Luckie v. United States Postal Serv., 2006-3236,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, May 31, 2006, Decided , May 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
