 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bradley v. Nicholson, 05-7192,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, June 5, 2006, Decided , June 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gates v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 05-3292,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, June 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a federal employee had not obtained a decision by the Office of Personnel Management on his request to change back from participating in the Federal Employees' Retirement System to participating in the Civil Service Retirement System, Merit Systems Protection Board properly dismissed employee's appeal to the Board per 5 U.S.C.S. § 8347(d)(1).
|
|||||
| Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 05-5145,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, June 5, 2006, Decided , June 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lacavera v. Dudas, 05-1204,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, June 5, 2006, Decided , June 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pactiv Corp. v. Dow Chem. Co., 05-1260,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, June 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Agreement between plaintiff and patent owner precluded plaintiff from challenging the validity of the patents at issue. Provision that plaintiff's obligation to pay royalties would terminate if the patents were found invalid through any proceeding did not expressly reserve the right to maintain future invalidity and enforceability challenges.
|
|||||
| Archibald v. Dep't of the Air Force, 06-3068,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: MSPB properly upheld the correction of federal employee's retirement eligibility from Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) to CSRS-Offset; the length in the break in employee's service (5 U.S.C.S. § 8402(b)(1) and 42 U.S.C.S. § 410(a)(5)) was measured from the date of employee's actual service, not the date he accepted his latest position.
|
|||||
| Burden v. United States Postal Serv., 05-3042,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, June 6, 2006, Decided , June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Independence Park Apts. v. United States, 05-5034, 05-5035,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the Emergency Low Income Housing Preservation Act (ELIHRA) and Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990 (LIHPRHA) caused a compensable, temporary taking of contractual rights of mortgagees, the damages awarded should have been reduced because a local rent control ordinance was not preempted by ELIHRA and LIHPRHA.
|
|||||
| KSend v. United States, 06-5033,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rejection of a business's bid for a federal contract was not arbitrary or capricious; original solicitation of bids, as well as a subsequent clarification of the solicitation, made clear that overhead transparencies for a presentation required as part of the selection process must be included with the bid.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
