 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Darby, No. 82,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, February 3, 1941, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court reversed a district court judgment holding that the Act, 29 U.S.C.S. ¿ 209 et seq., which it interpreted as a regulation of manufacturing within the states, was unconstitutional. At issue was whether Congress had constitutional power to prohibit the shipment in interstate commerce of lumber manufactured by employees whose wages were less than a prescribed minimum or whose weekly hours of labor at that wage were greater than a prescribed maximum, and whether it had power to prohibit the employment of workmen in the production of goods "for interstate commerce" at other than prescribed wages and hours. The court ruled that the power of Congress under the Commerce Clause was plenary to exclude any article from interstate commerce subject only to the specific prohibitions of the Constitution. Further, Congress, having by the Act adopted the policy of excluding from interstate commerce all goods produced for the commerce which did not conform to the specified labor standards, could choose the means reasonably adapted to the attainment of the permitted end, even though they involved control of intrastate activities.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
