 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ncaa v. Smith, No. 98-84,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, February 23, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Receipt of dues from federally funded member institutions by NCAA demonstrated that it only indirectly benefitted from such assistance, which was insufficient to afford coverage to plaintiff under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.
|
|||||
| Your Home Visiting Nurse Servs. v. Shalala, No. 97-1489,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, February 23, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A Medicare provider was not entitled to a provider reimbursement review board's review of a fiscal intermediary's refusal to reopen a reimbursement determination where the board had been divested of jurisdiction over the matter.
|
|||||
| Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm., No. 97-1252,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, February 24, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no jurisdiction under the INA over a suit alleging selective enforcement of immigration laws regarding deportation because the suit did not arise out of the commencement of proceedings, adjudication of cases, or execution of removal orders.
|
|||||
| Ariz. Dep't of Revenue v. Blaze Constr. Co., No. 97-1536,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, March 2, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a federal contractor rendered its services on an Indian reservation, a state could impose a nondiscriminatory privilege tax upon the proceeds from the contracts with the federal government.
|
|||||
| Holloway v. United States, No. 97-7164,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, March 2, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court's instruction, which stated that petitioner was guilty of carjacking if he had conditional intent to cause death or serious bodily harm if victims refused to turn over their cars, correctly interpreted the federal carjacking statute.
|
|||||
| Peguero v. United States, No. 97-9217,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, March 2, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court's failure to advise the defendant of his right to appeal did not entitle him to habeas relief because he knew of his right and did not suffer prejudice from the omission.
|
|||||
| Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sullivan, No. 97-2000,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, March 3, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation procedure allowing insurers to withhold payment of medical expenses pending review to determine if they were reasonable and necessary did not violate Fourteenth Amendment because insurers were not state actors.
|
|||||
| Cedar Rapids Cmty. Sch. Dist. v. Garret F. by Charlene F., No. 96-1793,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, March 3, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act required petitioner school board to pay for costs of continuous one-on-one nursing care for respondent student because the medical exclusion from related services applied exclusively to doctor's services.
|
|||||
| Nat'l Fed'n of Fed. Emples., Local 1309 v. DOI, Nos. 97-1184 AND 97-1243,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, March 3, 1999 *, Decided* Together with No. 97-1243, Federal Labor Relations Authority v. Department of the Interior et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Federal Labor Relations Authority had the authority to order respondent federal agency to engage in midterm bargaining but was not compelled to issue such order because the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute was ambiguous.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
