 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Evans v. Chavis, No. 04-721,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's finding that a California prisoner's request for appellate review made three years after a lower state court ruled against him was timely for the purposes of tolling the AEDPA time limitations for habeas petitions was not consistent with United States Supreme Court precedent.
|
|||||
| United States v. Georgia, (No. 04-1203), (No. 04-1236),
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 10, 2006 * , Decided * Together with No. 04-1236, Goodman v. Georgia et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: was an unequivocal expression of Congress's intent to abrogate state sovereign immunity. The inmate's claims for money damages against the state under Title II of the ADA were evidently based, at least in large part, on conduct that independently violated the provisions of, which incorporated theguarantee against cruel and unusual punishment., included the power to abrogate state sovereign immunity by authorizing private suits for damages against the states. Thus, insofar as Title II of the ADA created a private cause of action for damages against the states for conduct that actually violated the, Title II of the ADA validly abrogated state sovereign immunity. The Eleventh Circuit erred in dismissing the inmate's Title II of the ADA claims that were based on such unconstitutional conduct.
|
|||||
| Volvo Trucks N. Am., Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc., No. 04-905,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a truck dealer asserted that a manufacturer granted greater wholesale price concessions to other dealers for purposes of competitive bidding on truck sales, absent actual competition with a favored dealer of the manufacturer, the dealer was unable to show the competitive injury required under the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Sanders, No. 04-980,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where death penalty eligibility factors were invalid, an inmate was not entitled to habeas relief under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254, because the consideration of the invalid special circumstances gave rise to no constitutional violation since other sentencing factors enabled the sentencer to give aggravating weight to the same facts and circumstances.
|
|||||
| Dixon v. United States, No. 05-7053.,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Allen v. Ornoski, No. 05-8639 (05A639).,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 16, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Allen v. Ornoski, No. 05-8658 (05A646).,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 16, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Allen, No. 05-8659 (05A647).,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 16, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
