 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Burton v. Stewart, No. 05-9222,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though state prison inmate's habeas corpus petition asserted claims which were not exhausted in state court at time prior petition was denied, instant petition was second or successive petition and thus jurisdiction was lacking since inmate did not obtain appellate court authorization for second petition as required by 28 U.S.C.S. § 2244.
|
|||||
| MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., No. 05-608,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A patent licensee's payment of royalties under protest did not preclude a justiciable case or controversy under U.S. Const. art. III, since licensors' threatened legal action was coercive and preserved the licensee's right under the Declaratory Judgment Act to seek a declaration that the patent was invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, No. 05-998,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent's indictment alleging attempted illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326(a) was not defective for failing to specifically allege a particular overt act, because it implicitly alleged that he engaged in the necessary overt act simply by alleging that he attempted to enter the United States; it also complied with Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(c)(1).
|
|||||
| Norfolk Southern Ry. v. Sorrell, No. 05-746,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a FELA case arising from a railroad employee's accident, Missouri state courts erroneously applied different standards of causation to determine the railroad's negligence under 45 U.S.C.S. § 51 and the employee's contributory negligence under 45 U.S.C.S. § 53. FELA did not depart from the common-law practice of using the same causation standard.
|
|||||
| Hinck v. United States, No. 06-376.,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Struhs v. Wyner, No. 06-531.,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Uttecht v. Brown, No. 06-413.,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Watson v. Philip Morris Cos., No. 05-1284.,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
