U. S. Supreme Court, January, 2002, Federal Case law

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

Federal Courts - U. S. Supreme Court - January 22, 2002

Iannaccone v. Barnhart, 01-191, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

In re Ball, 01-890, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

In re Mays, 01-712, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

In re Simmons, 01-793, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Irwin Mortg. Corp. v. Culpepper, 01-695, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Jacquinot v. United States, 01-6937, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

James v. City of Dallas, 01-475, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Kansas v. Crane, No. 00-957, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: The United States Constitution did not permit civil commitment of a dangerous sexual offender without any lack-of-control determination; there needed to be proof of serious difficulty in controlling behavior.

Search Cases for Free

Law v. United States, 00-10622, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Lee v. Kemna, No. 00-6933, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: The denial of the prisoner's habeas petition was reversed because the state rules at issue, under the facts of the case, did not constitute a state ground adequate to bar federal habeas review.

Search Cases for Free

Communities Portal