 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ala. State Bar v. McBrayer, 1070661,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 9, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Board erred in concluding that panel should have suspended hearing and placed bar member on disability inactive status pursuant to Ala. R. Disc. P. 27(c); although member suffered from hearing loss, severe diabetes, neuropathy, and needed assistance of counsel, member never asked for continuance based on medical condition, and he defended himself.
|
|||||
| Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bone, 1061808, 1061834,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 9, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An insurer's appeal of an order granting victims summary judgment in its complaint seeking a declaration of its liabilities under a homeowner's policy was dismissed because the judgment was not final. The trial court entered summary judgment on three of the four coverage issues and found that a material question of fact existed as to the fourth.
|
|||||
| Be-Jeweled, L.L.C. v. AIG Baker Orange Beach Wharf, L.L.C., 1071345,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 9, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Owner was entitled to mandamus relief, directing transfer of case back to venue where it was initially filed because the basis of the transfer order--the doctrine of forum non conveniens, Ala. Code ¿ 6-3-21.1--did not apply; the first county was an improper venue and the owner did not have to object to the transfer motion in responsive pleading.
|
|||||
| Championcomm.net of Tuscaloosa, Inc. v. Morton, 1070488,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 9, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Payday lenders' appeal of an arbitration award was dismissed because there was no final judgment. The decision of the arbitrator did not provide a basis for appeal, and there was no indication in the record that the circuit court clerk entered the award as the judgment of the circuit court pursuant to Ala. Code ¿ 6-6-15.
|
|||||
| Crutcher v. Williams, 1050893,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 9, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred when it denied a doctor's motion for judgment as a matter of law under Ala. Code ¿ 12-21-12 in a patient's medical-negligence action under the Alabama Medical Liability Act, Ala. Code ¿¿ 6-5-480 et seq. and 6-5-541 et seq., as there was insufficient evidence that the doctor's conduct proximately caused her compensable injury.
|
|||||
| Ex parte C.J.A., 2070994,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 9, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a paternal grandmother's petition for a writ of mandamus was untimely under Ala. R. App. P. 21(a)(3), Ala. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(E), Ala. R. Juv. P. 28(C), and because she did not present a statement of good cause for her delay in filing the petition, the paternal grandmother was not entitled to mandamus relief.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Russell, 2070765,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 9, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A property owner's claims for reimbursement of allegedly overpaid ad valorem taxes or an attorney fee were barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity under Ala. Const. art. 1, ¿ 14 and further, they were not properly asserted where there was no compliance with the Alabama Taxpayers' Bill of Rights, Ala. Code ¿ 40-2A-1 et seq.
|
|||||
| Hereford v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 1070396,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 9, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment confirming an arbitrator's award was upheld because manifest disregard of the law was not a proper ground under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C.S. ¿ 10(a), for vacating, modifying, or correcting an arbitrator's decision.
|
|||||
| Lackey v. Lackey, 2070603,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 9, 2009, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
