 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ex parte Dunn, 1051387,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 5, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a hearing officer carefully considered a tenured teacher's employment history, including the good and the indefensible, pursuant to Ala. Code § 16-24-10(a), in determining a sanction under the Teacher Tenure Act, Ala. Code § 16-24-1 et seq., its decision to forego termination of the teacher, as sought, was not arbitrary and capricious.
|
|||||
| Federated Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vaughn, 1041867, 1050611,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 5, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court's order denying an insurer summary judgment on a breach of contract claim was reversed as Ala. Code § 32-7-23 did not prevent it from rejecting UM/UIM coverage for certain employees, notwithstanding that it maintained such coverage for others, and thus, the insurer had not breached the contract by refusing to pay on that basis.
|
|||||
| Laster v. Norfolk Southern Ry. , 1050532,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 5, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A railroad was properly granted summary judgment on a negligence claim where the child understood the risk in walking on the railroad right-of-way and appreciated the danger of a stopped train. Moreover, the rescue doctrine did not allow recovery as there was an insufficient showing that his companion did not appreciate the danger.
|
|||||
| Lawson v. Shelby County Sheriff's Office, 2050605,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 5, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Our S. Home Mgmt. v. Ponquinette, 2050540,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 5, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sistrunk v. Sikorsky Support Servs., 2050622,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 5, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Woodall, 1050389,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 5, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
