 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| A.H. v. R.M., 2990847,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant failed to meet her burden of proving change in custody would have materially promoted the children's best interests or the disruption caused thereby would have been offset by the benefits of the change.
|
|||||
| Baker v. State, CR-95-0292,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In appeal of capital murder conviction, defendant failed to show that his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance, failed to show that trial judge was biased, and failed to show photos were prejudicial.
|
|||||
| Christensen v. Southern Normal Sch., 1990872,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court answered certified questions from federal court regarding standard to determine whether breach of contract, fraud, and negligence claims were seeking to circumvent principle there was no cognizable claim for educational malpractice.
|
|||||
| Crittenden v. Ferguson, 2991021,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant attorney's conduct in advising client that she could be held in contempt for having moved without the court's permission, in violation of a custody order, did not amount to a willful and deliberate disobedience of the court's order.
|
|||||
| D.D.W. v. State, CR-99-0038,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order placing a juvenile on deferred prosecution status was defective, as the record did not show that the court either adjudicated the juvenile a delinquent, or suspended the proceedings by agreement of the parties.
|
|||||
| Dan River, Inc. v. Higgins, 2980878,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Esensoy v. Board of Pardons & Paroles, 2970991,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Acklin, 1991908,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Burnett, 1990255,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The supreme court reversed defendant's vehicular-homicide conviction. The trial court was required to instruct the jury on the statutory culpable mental states of knowingly, recklessly, or criminally negligent, where supported by the evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
