|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Alabama - January 12, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
Ala. Mun. & Envtl. Eng'rs, Inc. v. Slaughter Constr. Co., 2050007,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2007, Released
View this case - free
|
Overview: Damages award in favor of a contractor was reversed, as its sole remedy as an unsuccessful bidder under Alabama's Competitive Bid Law, Ala. Code § 41-16-20 et seq., was to seek to enjoin the execution of the public contract awarded to a competitor, pursuant to Ala. Code § 39-5-4, despite the elements of fraud alleged in its complaint.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Baugus v. City of Florence, 1051593,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2007, Released
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a city did not waive its motion to strike to at least three of the claims asserted by the residents adjoining a landfill, and because the trial court did not rule on the motion, the claims remained pending; therefore, pursuant to Ala. R. Civ. P. 54(b), the trial court's partial summary judgment was not a final, appealable judgment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Davis v. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc., 1050478,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2007, Released
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an action alleging the wrongful disbursement of a decedent's IRA proceeds to his sons, summary judgment entered against his wife was reversed on her claims of conversion, fraudulent misrepresentation and suppression, as material fact issues existed regarding the validity of a change of beneficiary form and the disclosure duties attached thereto.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|