 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Washington v. State, CR-05-1297,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in accepting a youthful-offender report (YOR) as a substitute for a mandatory presentence investigation report (PIR), as required by Ala. Code § 13A-5-47 and Ala. R. Crim. P. 26.3 in defendant's capital-murder trial, and although the YOR was thorough, the error was not harmless because the PIR was a mandatory requirement.
|
|||||
| Weinrib v. Duncan, 1050261,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, January 12, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in the allowing patient's medical malpractice action to be reinstated after the case had been removed to federal court, which declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the malpractice action; patient had 30 days pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1367(d) to refile action in state court after dismissal of it and did not do so.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
