 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ex parte Alapati, 1001881,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Doctor seeking mandamus to vacate protective order did not show information sought was calculated to lead to discovery of relevant material, so trial court did not abuse its discretion, and doctor had no clear legal right to have order vacated.
|
|||||
| Ex parte City of Dothan Pers. Bd., 1001978,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge's disqualification from case due to his representation in another matter by attorney appearing in case was terminated both by attorney's withdrawal from case and termination of other matter in which attorney represented him.
|
|||||
| Ex parte City of Tarrant, CR-01-0316,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When defendant appealed his municipal court convictions to circuit court, time within which city was to file municipal court record in circuit court began to run once defendant filed written appeal notice and appeal bond was set and approved.
|
|||||
| Fields v. State, CR-00-2085,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's meetings with probation officer were not custodial interrogations; thus, defendant was not entitled to Miranda warnings before speaking with probation officer and his admission of violating his probation was admissible.
|
|||||
| Hamm v. State, CR-99-0654,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant in postconviction proceeding was not entitled to the attorney of his choice; and defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial, on direct appeal, or at postconviction proceeding.
|
|||||
| Holloway v. State, CR-00-1440,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order denying defendant's postconviction relief petition, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, made insufficient findings on issues raised.
|
|||||
| Kirkland v. State, CR-00-2494,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by suspending 15 years of defendant's 25-year prison sentence; no portion of her single sentence could be suspended pursuant to the Alabama Split Sentence Act, because her sentence was longer than 20 years.
|
|||||
| McNabb v. State, CR-98-0967,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err when sentencing defendant, as the trial court considered all evidence presented in mitigation, and the evidence supported the holding that the aggravating circumstances outweighed the mitigating circumstances.
|
|||||
| McQueen v. State, CR-01-0100,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's argument that split portion of his sentence was illegal, and trial court did not have jurisdiction to impose sentence, had merit. Trial court had to make specific, written findings of fact regarding imposition of split sentence.
|
|||||
| Peterson v. State, CR-00-1417,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's findings on second remand were insufficiently specific to allow appellate court to determine offense underlying defendant's felony-murder conviction and, thus, his double jeopardy violation claim.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
