 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ex parte Herron, 1971256,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Littlepage, 1991135,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify divorce judgment to order former husband to pay off balances of credit card accounts that were not addressed in original judgment.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Lovejoy, 1981758,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Roberts, 1990565,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate decision to reverse a trial court which modified custody after the child's mother had moved and left the child behind with her mother, was reversed because it reweighed evidence that had been presented ore tenus at trial.
|
|||||
| Hudman v. Wesson, 2991097,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellants' claim to own, by adverse possession, a strip of land between their property and appellees' was properly denied, as they failed to show where an encroaching billboard had been located during the statutory 10 year period.
|
|||||
| Wetterhan v. Vesta Ins. Group, Inc., 1990956,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The evidence put in dispute the question of whether the plaintiffs were terminated without cause. Consequently, the summary judgment in favor of respondent was reversed and the cause remanded.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
