 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Duke v. Duke, 2010889,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 7, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father seeking modification of his child support obligation imposed due to his agreement to pay an amount greater than required by child support guidelines did not show change in the circumstances resulting in the initial rebuttal of the guidelines.
|
|||||
| Eskridge v. Allstate Ins. Co., 1011176,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 7, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's motion for leave to amend complaint to add allegations of continuation of wrongdoing alleged in original complaint was properly denied where appellate court had instructed trial court to enter judgment for employer.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Brooks, CR-02-0692,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 7, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the judge who was to proceed at petitioner's capital murder trial was the same judge that signed the search warrant pursuant to which the evidence against petitioner was obtained, this was not sufficient to warrant recusal of the trial judge.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Connors, 1011608, 1012111,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 7, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to enjoin the removal of a political candidate's name from a primary election ballot was dismissed because the results of the primary election ballot, which the candidate lost, rendered the action moot.
|
|||||
| Ex parte D.S.M., 1012220,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 7, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte Gen. Nutrition Corp., 1011760, 1011861, and 1011882,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 7, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied petitioners' motion to dismiss a wrongful death action on the basis of forum non conveniens; the inconvenience to petitioners' witnesses in litigating in Alabama was not so great that the action had to be dismissed.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Marlowe, 1012174,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 7, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The State produced sufficient evidence indicating a victim suffered a serious physical injury where the 75-year-old victim was hit in the head, robbed, and rendered unconscious, suffering a cut to the head requiring metal staples.
|
|||||
| Ex parte McNish, 1991233,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 7, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals erred in holding that defendant did not preserve her challenge to the State's evidence and erred in not addressing the merits of defendant's claim that the evidence against her was legally insufficient.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Rymer, 1010936,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 7, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A writ of mandamus was issued to a trial court, which abused its discretion in denying petitioners' motion to dismiss for improper venue, as attorney failed to demonstrate that enforcement of forum-selection clause was unfair or unreasonable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
