LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Alabama - February 23 - March 1, 2001

  
Alabama State Docks Terminal Ry. v. Lyles, 1991022, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 23, 2001, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellant, a subdivision of the State of Alabama, was immune to a suit for money damages and doctrine of constructive waiver of immunity did not apply to give appellee basis for suit as doctrine had been implicitly, then expressly, overruled.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Birmingham News Co. v. Lynch, 1992184, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 23, 2001, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendants could compel plaintiff to resolve most of his contractual disputes with them through arbitration because the Federal Arbitration Act applied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cannon v. Michelin N. Am., Inc., 2980649, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 23, 2001, Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ex parte Floyd, 1990900, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 23, 2001, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Statute of limitations claim against notary public and surety did not begin to run until corporation, holder of a note secured by a mortgage, was required to defend its claim against a subsequent mortgage holder.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ex parte Sanders, 1980809, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 23, 2001, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Petitioner, sentenced under the Habitual Felony Offender Act to life imprisonment for stealing a bicycle, was precluded from postconviction relief from an excessive sentence, because he should have raised constitutional issue on direct appeal.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ex parte T.T., 1000424, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 23, 2001, Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Shacklette v. Drawdy, 2991008, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 23, 2001, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in granting specific performance under land sale contract were indispensable parties were not joined, contract was ambiguous and unenforceable, and conditions precedent to performance were unsatisfied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Veteto v. Yocum, 2991377, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 23, 2001, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: The court of civil appeals was unable to issue its certificate of judgment until the supreme court struck appellant's certiorari petition.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ex parte Burnsed, 1990792, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2001, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Appeals court improperly dismissed defendant's appeal from municipal court because his trial transcript was not prepared by a court-appointed reporter; the transcript, prepared at defendant's expense, was not objected to and was sufficient.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.