 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bell v. T.R. Miller Mill Co., 1980653,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 4, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order for directed verdict reversed on plaintiff's negligence claim because telephone pole was product for purposes of manufacturer's liability, and plaintiff presented sufficient evidence for there to be question for jury.
|
|||||
| Body Max Fitness Ctr. v. Sheffield, 2981436,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 4, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In health club's action for payment due under provisions of health-club membership contract, judgment in favor of club member was reversed since trial court erred in finding that member was totally and permanently disabled.
|
|||||
| Byrd v. State, CR-98-2376,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 4, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's guilty plea voided where essential element of offense was not stated in court; thus defendant's guilty plea was not proper and conviction was voided as well.
|
|||||
| Carr v. Osborn, 2981383,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 4, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in granting defendant summary judgment as to adult plaintiff's request for declaration that defendant was his father since no statute of limitations prevented plaintiff from obtaining declaration of paternity.
|
|||||
| Crapps v. State, CR-98-2396,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 4, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant refiling a motion on instructions from the appellate court could not be barred from filing such a motion on grounds that it was a successive pleading when the action was done pursuant to the appellate order.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Borden, 1972037,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 4, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of murder and sentenced to death by electrocution for stabbing to death a 61-year-old grandmother in the presence of her two grandchildren because no plain error warranted reversal.
|
|||||
| Gamble v. State, CR-97-0698,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 4, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for capital murder as accomplice affirmed because no plain error was found in guilt or sentencing proceedings before jury, but remanded as to sentence because statutory mitigating circumstance was not negated.
|
|||||
| Griffin v. State, CR-97-1026,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 4, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The defendant was not entitled to a reversal of his conviction and death sentence because the aggravating circumstances outweighed the mitigating circumstances surrounding his case.
|
|||||
| Harris v. State, CR-98-2465,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 4, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Case involving revocation of probation was remanded to trial court for fact-finding in regards to hearing, as court was unable to determine from record whether hearing had taken place.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
