 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lloyd Noland Found., Inc. v. City of Fairfield Healthcare Auth., 1000889,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 22, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment against medical foundation for city that purchased its assets from initial buyer subject to foundation's option to repurchase beds, while foundation was seeking certificate of need, was remanded. Contract bound city to cooperate.
|
|||||
| McLean v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc., 2000692,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 22, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Shipper's state-law breach-of-contract claim, even if not preempted by Carmack Amendment, was barred by state law, as time-to-sue limitation in carrier's bill of lading was reasonable and enforceable, and suit was fired after time limit expired.
|
|||||
| Pritchett v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2000850,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 22, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under "repair or replace" insurance policy language, insurance company was liable for diminished value of vehicle and was not required to compensate for possible difference between value before collision and value after damage was repaired.
|
|||||
| T.R.S.S. v. R.S., 2000610,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 22, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grandparents did not fall within definition of grandparent-visitation statute because they were not parents of parent of minor child when they filed petition; their son's parental rights had been terminated in prior final divorce judgment.
|
|||||
| Vinson Guard Serv. v. Ret. Sys. of Ala., 1001561,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 22, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State competitive bid statute did not authorize mandatory relief, namely, an order compelling a state agency to award a contract to a bidder, so the trial court could not enjoin a state agency from rebidding a contract because of bidding errors.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
