 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ex parte Jackson, 1021472,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 20, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied defendant's suppression motion as the evidence was obtained in a roadblock-type stop that was permissible under the Fourth Amendment. Stop was minimally intrusive, and officers conducting the stop had limited discretion.
|
|||||
| Ford v. Jefferson County, 2020425,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 20, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to county and its juvenile services because juvenile officers established that their speech was a matter of public concern and created factual issue as to whether their free-speech rights were violated.
|
|||||
| Harley v. Bruno's Supermarkets, Inc., 2020831,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 20, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The question of whether a curb where a customer fell was open and notorious under partial light conditions was a jury question that prohibited summary judgment.
|
|||||
| Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. Ingram, 1020911, 1021032,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 20, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying an insurer's motion for a judgment as a matter of law as insured's fraud and fraudulent suppression claims were barred by two-year statute of limitations. The insured filed suit over 10 years after he received his policy.
|
|||||
| Salter v. Hamiter, 1021358,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 20, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where decedent transferred three deeds to grantee prior to decedent's death and asked grantee not to record deeds until after her death, decedent's failure to record deeds did not defeat undisputed evidence of grantee's acceptance of deeds.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
