 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brannan & Guy, P.C. v. City of Montgomery, 1002092,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Quantum meruit did not allow law firm to collect fees above unilateral contract with city. City attorney had no apparent authority to accept firm's offer to do work at a higher fee, nor did payment of higher fee ratify its unauthorized acceptance.
|
|||||
| Brooks v. State, CR-00-1892,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since defendant had not alleged that no oath was administered, he had not pleaded facts sufficient to show that his issue was jurisdictional; thus, trial court had jurisdiction to render judgment and to impose defendant's sentence.
|
|||||
| C.M. v. D.P., 2001050,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of father's petition to have parental rights terminated was proper as there was no evidence that termination was in child's best interests, as future rights to support, parental affiliation, and inheritance would be severed.
|
|||||
| CSX Transp., Inc. v. Matweld, Inc., 1001700, 1001701,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly concluded, by applying Florida's apparent-manufacturer's-liability doctrine to the facts, that supplier was merely seller of the tamper, not its manufacturer.
|
|||||
| Cabarrubia v. State, CR-00-1688,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Casaday v. State, CR-00-2642,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prior conviction of defendant, when he was under the age of 21, for driving under the influence of alcohol constituted a prior conviction for sentence-enhancement purposes for his fourth driving under the influence offense.
|
|||||
| Coleman v. State, CR-00-0835,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When viewing the evidence in its entirety, it supported district court's determination that an information was properly filed in the cases and defendant's petition in each case was due to be denied.
|
|||||
| Conner v. State, CR-01-0013,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Amendment of indictment to include enhancements was not error as no additional offense was charged and it did not affect defendant's substantial rights. Trial judge had discretion to split or suspend imposition of sentence enhancements.
|
|||||
| Coughlin v. State, CR-00-2114,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
