LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Alabama - March 10, 2006

  
Pritchett v. ICN Med. Alliance, Inc., 1041702, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Given evidence that a lessor should have known that its employee was employing a practice of using wet gauze as a safety device in laser eye surgeries, instead of safety goggles or a corneal shield as instructed, it was erroneously granted summary judgment on claims that it negligently trained and/or supervised its employee and vicarious liability.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Redtop Mkt., Inc., 1041740, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Because the parties did not expressly agree to extend the time within which the trial court could rule on the State's motion for a new trial beyond the 90-day period allowed by Ala. R. Civ. P. 59.1, and that consent did not appear of record, then the State's motion was denied by operation of law.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Tenet Health Sys. Med., Inc. v. Roberts, 2040679, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 10, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in purporting to retain jurisdiction to allow employee to reopen workers' compensation case should her condition change as settlement agreement did not expressly allow employee to reopen case and there was no statutory authority allowing her to do so. Ala. Code § 25-5-57(a)(4)b (1975) only permitted employer to reopen case.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.