 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hill v. State, CR-01-0304,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by denying defendant postconviction relief where appellate court was unable to ascertain from record whether defendant was made aware of the minimum and maximum sentence authorized by law before entering his plea.
|
|||||
| Hood v. State, CR-00-2451,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of probation was remanded for trial court to prepare written statement of reasons for revocation and evidence relied upon in doing so. Simple notation that probation was revoked did not satisfy due process.
|
|||||
| Humphrey v. State, CR-01-0145,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's second-degree domestic violence conviction for hitting his wife with baseball bat was upheld. Even though she did not specifically testify that he hit her with bat, the circumstantial evidence sufficiently showed that he had.
|
|||||
| Key v. State, CR-99-0220,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred at capital murder sentencing hearing by not entering specific findings as to each aggravating circumstance, each statutory mitigating circumstance, and each nonstatutory mitigating circumstance.
|
|||||
| Key v. State, CR-00-0305,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Year and a day rule was judicially abrogated. Defendant laid no proper predicate for in camera inspection of State's witness's statement, witness's grand jury testimony was admissible, and spousal privilege did not apply to polygamous marriage.
|
|||||
| Mathis v. Harrell Co., 1001816,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of summary judgment to product manufacturer, product supplier, and farmworker's employer was improper as the injured farmworker raised jury questions as to the negligence of the other parties concerning his injury from farm machinery.
|
|||||
| Nieto v. State, CR-00-2528,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Border patrol agent's decision to stop defendant's vehicle was based on reasonable suspicion, as he observed rigid appearance of driver and sudden way passenger ducked after noticing agent; agent suspected that criminal activity was afoot.
|
|||||
| Reed v. State, CR-00-2674,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because probation revocation order did not contain a statement of evidence relied on and reasons for revocation, general rules of preservation did not apply in the revocation proceeding.
|
|||||
| Richey v. State, CR-01-0371,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 1, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claim counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve issue of trial court's admission of evidence of events of night prior to fatal car accident was meritorious on its face. As trial court's order did not address the issue, matter was remanded.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
