 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Martin v. State Dep't of Mental Health & Mental Retardation, 2991179,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's petition for judicial review of an agency's decision terminating her employment was not actually filed in trial court until it was received, which was beyond the extended period the trial court had allowed for filing the petition.
|
|||||
| Morrow v. Helms, 2990942,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In will contest action, fact that decedent's will and acknowledgment contained no notary seal did not mean that it had been improperly executed as it otherwise complied with the statutory requirements for a self-proved will.
|
|||||
| Tefco Fin. Co. v. Green, 1991402,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, March 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Failure of defendants to introduce evidence that defendants' business was conducted in interstate commerce meant that binding arbitration could not take place since such evidence had to be introduced before Federal Arbitration Act applied.
|
|||||
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Langham, 2991020,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's motion for judgment as matter of law was improperly denied. No evidence revealed appellant negligently or wantonly constructed drainage system. No proof showed system proximately caused flooding damage to appellee's property.
|
|||||
| Wylie v. Wylie, 2991221,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, March 16, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Child support order could be modified and application of child support guidelines was mandatory; trial court could order maintenance of life insurance for child's benefit, but insurance amount could not be based on postminority support award.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
