 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ex parte Alabama DOT, 1981916,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 25, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was improperly denied as transportation department was state agency immune from liability, and no evidence was presented to show officers and employees engaged in fraudulent, malicious, or bad-faith conduct.
|
|||||
| Ex parte GMC, 1981717,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 25, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court's faulty interpretation of a statute as conferring jurisdiction rather than directing proper venue led to the reversal and remand of defendant corporation's unemployment compensation appeal.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Hurth, 1980459,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 25, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Writ of mandamus was granted ordering the trial court to vacate its order requiring indigent petitioner prisoner to pay a docket fee when filing a petition for postconviction relief.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co., 1981420,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, February 25, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Farmer v. Town of Daphne, CR-99-0091,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 25, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal defendant's sentence of a fine for his convictions of driving with a revoked license and speeding was remanded because the circuit court imposed a fine greater than what was allowed by law.
|
|||||
| Hardley v. State, CR-97-0137,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 25, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| James v. James, 2970720,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 25, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Meadows v. State, CR-98-2313,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 25, 2000, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal appellant's case was remanded for resentencing because the trial court improperly ordered appellant's sentences for selling drugs to run concurrently when the statutory enhancements had to run consecutively.
|
|||||
| Norman v. Norman, 2981289,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, February 25, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
